Evaluation criteria

Checklist for article submission

Those who referee articles submitted to the Sinergia Académica Electronic Journal must submit their evaluations in this Format for opinion.

All the manuscript will be submitted to the judgement process of the referees, through the double-blind peer review system. The anonymity and confidentiality of these people is explicitly kept.

This guide was created with the purpose of guiding the peer reviewers who will evaluate the writings for Sinergia Académica Electronic Journal, published by the Editorial Tecnocientífica Americana.

Opinion

Title of the article:

Peer reviewer:

Dear expert, below are the indicators for the evaluation of the article. You must give an individual grade to each one in a range from very low to very high; for this purpose, it is necessary to mark with an X in the box provided. The overall conclusion will depend on the value you give to each indicator.

Nro	Indicadores	Very low	Low	Mid	High	Very high
1.	Originality
2.	Newness
3.	Novelty of the research and value of the results
4.	Scientific value of the conclusions
5.	Merits of the manuscript
6.	Correspondence between title, abstract and article
7.	Quality of the structure and extension of the article
8.	Depth in the analysis of the problem
9.	Scientific positioning
10.	Style and Scientific Writing
11.	Adjustment to the standard for quoting and referring
12	Quality in the bibliographic settlement and its actuality
13	Insufficiencies of the manuscript

 

No	General Conclusion	Evaluation
1.	Accepted for publication
2.	Revisions needed (approved for publication when minor corrections have been made)
3.	Resubmit for review (subject to mandatory changes and re-evaluation)
4.	Reject manuscript
5.	Send to another site (when it does not respond to the profile of the journal)

 

Words of advice

Conclusions