Assessment instruments after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51736/sa.v7iEspecial%204.291

Keywords:

evaluation, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, instruments, tests, functionality, strength.

Abstract

Clinical trials focused on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) use multiple assessment methods to determine the effectiveness of the interventions; however, the tests used depend on the authors' criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the assessment tools used in ACLR with autograft or allograft clinical trials. A search of the Cochrane, Scielo, Pubmed, Epistemonikos and PEDro databases was performed until May 10, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on systematic reviews or meta-analyses from the last five years that specified the type of graft, included follow-up details, and were in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria contained studies without population numbers, description of sex or no available access. There are post-surgical follow-up times to assess strength that exceed 24 months. The evaluation instruments used included the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), isokinetic and isometric strength tests; clinical tests such as Lachman, Pivot Shift Test. Functional assessments such as Sigle leg Hop Test; Ccestionaries associated with surgery and function such as the IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, Shellbourne Trumper; and finally, subjective assessments such as anterior knee pain, pain on kneeling, Active Join Position Sense Assessment. Numerous assessment tools are available after ACL reconstruction, but it is essential to identify the most effective ones in clinical settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fan, D. Y., Ma, J., & Zhang, L. (2023). Contralateral grafts have comparable efficacy to ipsilateral grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. In Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04082-z

Giesche, F., Niederer, D., Banzer, W., & Vogt, L. (2020). Evidence for the effects of prehabilitation before ACL-reconstruction on return to sport-related and self-reported knee function: A systematic review. In PLoS ONE 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240192

Herbawi, F., Lozano-Lozano, M., Lopez-Garzon, M., Postigo-Martin, P., Ortiz-Comino, L., Martin-Alguacil, J. L., Arroyo-Morales, M., & Fernandez-Lao, C. (2022). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Strength Recovery Measured by Isokinetic Dynamometer Technology after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autografts vs. Hamstring Tendon Autografts or Patellar Tendon Autografts. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116764

Johnston, P. T., McClelland, J. A., Feller, J. A., & Webster, K. E. (2021). Knee muscle strength after quadriceps tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06311-y

Kanakamedala, A. C., de SA, D., Obioha, O. A., Arakgi, M. E., Schmidt, P. B., Lesniak, B. P., & Musahl, V. (2019). No difference between full thickness and partial thickness quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. In Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5042-z

Montalvo, A. M., Schneider, D. K., Webster, K. E., Yut, L., Galloway, M. T., Heidt, R. S., Kaeding, C. C., Kremcheck, T. E., Magnussen, R. A., Parikh, S. N., Stanfield, D. T., Wall, E. J., & Myer, G. D. (2019). Anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis of injury incidence by sex and sport classification. Journal of Athletic Training, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-407-16

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ , 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Roman, V. E., De Oliveira, D. E., De Lima, M. V., Junior, A. D., Betoni Guglielmetti, L. G., Leite Cury, R. D. P., & Baches Jorge, P. (2020). Quadriceps autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A literature review. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220202601214002

Tan, S. H. S., Lau, B. P. H., & Krishna, L. (2019). Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Knee Surgery, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669916

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Rojas Ibarra, C. E. ., & Espín Pastor, V. E. . (2024). Assessment instruments after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sinergia Académica, 7(Especial 4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.51736/sa.v7iEspecial 4.291

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)